Benutzer Diskussion:Kpwessel: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 5: | Zeile 5: | ||
:Problem was that the Main page (Computer_terms_de) was not existing, so the system did not now, to which page to go back. --[[Benutzer:kpwessel|kpw]] 16:11, 2. Nov 2004 (CET) | :Problem was that the Main page (Computer_terms_de) was not existing, so the system did not now, to which page to go back. --[[Benutzer:kpwessel|kpw]] 16:11, 2. Nov 2004 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
Does it make sense to have the categories occupations, diseases, latin words, coins, etc. at all in the WIKI_en ? If a foreigner doesn't know the meaning of the word he wouldn't know into which category to look anyway. Wouldn't it be better to go the other way around and put EVERYTHING in the dictionary and THEN explain thoroughly what it means ? --[[Benutzer:Zscheile|wolf]] 07:11, 3. Nov 2004 (CET) | |||
Version vom 3. November 2004, 06:11 Uhr
Don't know if you are monitoring the WIKI_EN...
New Question
I am puzzled... On the occupations/a.. etc. you always get a re-direct like "<occupations" on top. This makes it easier to go back to the preceding page. However, just started with Computer terms and there it doesn't show automatically.. and I did exactly the same... What did I do wrong ?? Gruss --wolf 14:46, 2 Nov 2004 (CET)
- Problem was that the Main page (Computer_terms_de) was not existing, so the system did not now, to which page to go back. --kpw 16:11, 2. Nov 2004 (CET)
Does it make sense to have the categories occupations, diseases, latin words, coins, etc. at all in the WIKI_en ? If a foreigner doesn't know the meaning of the word he wouldn't know into which category to look anyway. Wouldn't it be better to go the other way around and put EVERYTHING in the dictionary and THEN explain thoroughly what it means ? --wolf 07:11, 3. Nov 2004 (CET)